New Content Daily Sign Up Here

On August 11, 2015 I gave a presentation discussing the so-called Hong Kong Startup visa that everyone is getting so excited about.

PRACTICE UPDATE: How the content must now be read in light of current ImmD policy:

Historically, this comparative piece tackled the dilemma faced by aspiring founders holding a conventional job offer: should they accept employment under a standard General Employment Policy (GEP) work visa or turn it down to launch their own business via the government’s “start-up visa” enhancement scheme? The Geeza broke down the trade-offs with characteristic pragmatism, explaining that while employer sponsorship offered stability, transitioning to or independently pursuing the startup route was commercially straightforward and administratively forgiving. Founders were advised that they did not need institutional backing or heavy corporate resources to establish their own venture. If an entrepreneur preferred autonomy over employment, ImmD would readily entertain an investment application underpinned by modest seed funding of a few hundred thousand dollars, a flexible serviced office or co-working space, and a phased commitment to create local jobs over a multi-year horizon.

The game has changed from a flexible strategic choice into a high-stakes institutional trap. In the post-April 2026 administrative environment, walking away from or declining an eligible corporate employment sponsorship to pursue an un-incubated business venture is near-fatal to an applicant’s immigration status. Under administrative practice aligned with TTPS Category A operational substance (~HKD 2.5M enterprise scale), ImmD will not entertain early-stage entrepreneurial ambitions in the mainstream investment stream without immediate, non-negotiable corporate hardware audited on day one: HKD 1.5M–2.0M in deployed corporate bank liquidity, an executed commercial lease for exclusive physical premises (“four walls”) disqualifying serviced and co-working desks entirely, and active Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) payroll contributions for 2–3 local Hong Kong permanent residents.

Consequently, unless an applicant has secured confirmed, documented admission into an officially accredited government incubator (such as Cyberport or HKSTP)—which acts as the sole statutory mechanism to waive these empirical prerequisites—the only viable immigration strategy is to secure and maintain a conventional GEP employment visa with an established sponsor. Forgoing standard employment in favor of bootstrapping an independent startup under the historical illusion of administrative leniency guarantees swift and summary refusal, leaving the applicant stripped of legal residence.

In this segment at o Connect in Sheung Wan, I set out the difference between securing an employment visa on the basis of investing in Hong Kong versus the idea you have opened a company and sought to employ yourself in that self owned business.

The Rest of the Series

1 – Introduction

2 – Policy

3 – Got A Visa Problem?

4 – Just Visiting

5 –  Job Offer Work Visa

6 – Entrepreneur Visa

7 – Getting One

8 – Catch 22

9 – Loved Ones

10 – Ticking the Box

11 – D-I-Y Startup Visa

GET STARTED ON YOUR APPLICATION HERE

You can download the slides from this presentation along with a 13 page Accelerator programme crib sheet here.